Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Shifting Gears after Oscar

The beginning of the year I always get myself wrapped up in catching as many of the Oscar nominated films as is feasible so I can feel like I'm making educated predictions. My 13 of 24 showing on said predictions shows that I'm not exactly on the pulse of the Academy, but I don't mind that at all. My tastes are my own and I make no apology for that. I caught a lot of other stuff in the last month, too, I've had a lot of stuff recommended to me, and I've been working on some recent "cult" lists that I've taken a shining to. Moving forward I'm hoping to make a point to try to do a little bit of a lot of things and try to get at leasts a few posts up per week in the hopes of figuring out what kind of voice I can find for this space. I intend to continue the "Drunk Movie Time" series, since I've gotten a good response from that, but I'm also hoping that by writing more regularly I can hone the edge of some skills that have grown a bit rusty in their misuse, namely some serious critical analysis that digs deeper than a simple review. I have a couple of things in mind, just need to find the time.


A couple of quick, informal reviews:


The Perfect Host (2010 - Directed by Nick Tomnay)


Noticed shades of Funny Games and Sleuth running through this dark little number, but ultimately not nearly as disturbing as the former, nor as smart as the latter (though that would indeed be a tall order in both cases). David Hyde Pierce is deviously smart and the story is weird with the potential to twist and surprise, but I felt like the best of the twists comes a bit too early and leaves us riding out to the end on a a gentle wave instead of being corked against the rocks.
-- 72/100 --




It Came from Kuchar (2009 - Directed by Jennifer M. Kroot)

It's too bad that some people are often not appreciated until after they're already gone, and for me such is the case with George Kuchar who passed away 5 months ago. He and his twin brother Mike were at the forefront of underground cinema staring in the late 1950s-early 1960s and their quick, dirty, low-budget films have been an inspiration for directors from John Waters to Guy Maddin to Atom Egoyan. I would say that they're "hard to find," but the truth is until lately I just haven't been looking in the right place for them. These days you can find clips of "Hold Me While I'm Naked" and "Sins of the Fleshapoids" and even "Thundercrack!" on Youtube, and while the films the Kuchars birthed are still as crazy as ever, streaming them on demand from your laptop takes a bit of the DIY, underground fun out of it. This doc does a mind-blowing job of putting these two iconoclasts and their work in context. Not for the faint of heart or even the slightly conservative, but lots of great interviews, tons of outlandish clips, a real treat for any B-movie mavens out there.
-- 85/100 --

Sunday, February 26, 2012

2012 Oscar Picks, End Game


[The predictions make me seem smart, the contrariness makes me seem hip. Obligatory link to the Indie Spirit Awards]
Apologies that this final part is not as in-depth as it could have been. I’ve had a few things going on in the real world, ranging from an extremely obtuse landlord to preparations for my own form of walkabout. But here are my thoughts for the final batch of awards.  Other categories discussed here and here.
(Prediction bolded. If I’ve linked a film you can click through to a review I’ve already done on this here blog. Didn’t manage to get ‘em all written up, but c’est la vie. Deal.)
Best Picture
Nominees:

In this case I’ve listed the nominees in order from my favorite to least, (the rest are alphabetical) but I’m gonna start by ruining the whole show: The Artist is going to win Best Picture. If that’s all you wanted to find out you can stop reading. It’s a year for nostalgia, and this hits almost all the right notes. “But wait,” you may be saying, “The Descendants is supposed to be really amazing. It might win.” Or, “I saw The Descendants and thought it was excellent.” In either case  you’re wrong. I really liked the AV Club article that breaks down the safe-ness and feel-goody-ness of the nominees, especially where he calls out people for elevating The Descendants when it is probably Payne’s 4th best work. Out of 5. Payne’s a great writer and capable director, it’s good but safe, and I thought Beginners did more with similar thematic material, was a bit upset it wasn’t nominated.
The most challenging of this batch is The Tree of Life, but it’s a very polarizing film. Hugo is my number two, but as a student of film who has studied Melies I’ll admit I really got caught up in sections commemorating early cinema, and I am consciously choosing to ignore its many shortcomings. Extremely Loud is dead last by a landslide as a much poorer, almost exploitative version of the same “orphaned kid searching to match lock to key” story as Hugo. I really enjoyed Midnight in Paris, and the rest I liked generally but not passionately.

I’m gonna be short & sweet with the rest of the picks, if I get some time to elaborate later today I’ll update and notify, but for now...

Best Foreign Language Film
Nominees:
  • Bullhead (Belgium)
  • Footnote (Israel)
  • In Darkness (Poland)
  • Monsieur Lazhar (Canada)
  • A Separation (Iran)
A Separation is first on my list of films that I’m frustrated I wasn’t yet able to see. C’mon, Mich Theater, why must I wait until March?
Best Animated Feature
Nominees:
  • A Cat in Paris
  • Chico & Rita
  • Kung Fu Panda 2
  • Puss in Boots
  • Rango
I’m going to admit I liked Kung Fu Panda 1 & 2 more than most, but all signs point to Rango, which I’m cool with.  Interesting column about the category highlighting the two wild cards. Agreed that there is almost never sufficient representation here from Japan, the rare Miyazaki nod notwithstanding.


Best Documentary, Feature

Nominees: 
See Wednesday's post. Pina was pretty great, visually dazzling, but it's not enough of a bio-doc and I have a hard time calling a "dance film" a documentary, so I'm rooting for Paradise Lost 3, sight unseen.


Best Performance, Lead Actor
Nominees: 
  • Demián Bechir  - A Better Life
  • George Clooney - The Descendants
  • Jean Dujardin - The Artist
  • Gary Oldman - Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  • Brad Pitt - Moneyball
This may tilt to Clooney, who is good, but he’s Clooney. For all the fawning over The Descendants, I’m not convinced. I like Dujardin to take this instead.
Best Performance, Lead Actress
Nominees:
  • Glenn Close - Albert Nobbs
  • Viola Davis - The Help
  • Rooney Mara - The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
  • Meryl Streep - The Iron Lady
  • Michelle Williams - My Week with Marilyn

I have not seen all of these, so I’m rooting for Michelle Williams, who I have been in love with since her "Dawson’s Creek" days and should have won last year for Blue Valentine. Would be okay with the “young hip” nod to Mara.
Best Performance, Supporting Actor
Nominees:
  • Kenneth Branagh - My Week with Marilyn
  • Johan Hill - Moneyball
  • Nick Nolte - Warrior
  • Christopher Plummer - Beginners
  • Max von Sydow - Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
For my money it’s Plummer, though Nolte was notably great, too. This category is a great example of the Academy limiting itself with 5 nominees. It’s missing some Patton Oswalt (Young Adult) and Albert Brooks (Drive).

Best Performance, Supporting Actress
Nominees:

And this category is a great example of the Academy punching me in the face. Melissa McCarthy was definitely the best thing about Bridesmaids, but award-worthy? Psssh.

Best Director
Nominees:

A bit of a toss-up. I would vote Malick, but I highly doubt that will happen, so predicting Hazanavicius. Will likely portend the Best Pic result.
Best Writing - Original Screenplay
Nominees:

By process of elimination I’m giving it to The Artist, though I think Margin Call is equally deserving.

Best Writing - Adapted Screenplay
Nominees:
  • The Descendants
  • Hugo 
  • The Ides of March
  • Moneyball
  • Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

My vote is Hugo, because I’m a sap. But my prediction is The Descendants, grudgingly.

Best Cinematography
Nominees:

Tree of Life Please please please otherwise the world has no meaning.

Best Editing
Nominees:
  • The Artist
  • The Descendants
  • The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
  • Hugo
  • Moneyball
In my opinion this tends to be a rather bland category. I’m going for Hugo (Thelma!) in the absence of more cutting-edge fare. Will live when The Artist wins. Would rather see something indie like Another Earth or Bellflower, however unlikely. And a pox on the lack of Beginners!

See you on the red carpet! (I spilled some wine.)

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Oscar Docs Preface/Paradise Lost 1&2


This is leading up me making my mind up about the Best Documentary Features (or so says Oscar)

Nominees: 
  • Hell and Back Again (click for review)
  • If a Tree Falls (click for review...hey that's the same place!)
  • Pina (I plan to catch this tomorrow in 3D)
  • Undefeated (um, I’m not gonna see this one by Sunday. Damn.)
  • Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory (which brings me to):

Caveat: I have not yet seen Paradise Lost 3 either and won't before Sunday.

Supra-caveat leading into review: I did manage to ready myself for it by watching its predecessors, Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills and Paradise Lost 2: Revelations

I’d been vaguely aware of Paradise Lost but never taken the time, but I’m glad I finally did. Premiering in 1996, the original captures the aftermath of the gruesome murder of three small boys in the small town of West Memphis, Arkansas, in 1993. Three teenage boys are accused of the crime - in the near-unanimous view of the townspeople they are the only possible culprits, “because...well, just look at ‘em.” The boys’ appearance and odd behavior, combined with a (possibly forced) confession, turns the trial into a classic case of “guilty until proven innocent.”
HBO Films, at that time a burgeoning player in the field of documentary production, was granted virtually unfettered access to all of the major players in the case - the parents of the victims, the accused and their families, detectives and lawyers - with most unafraid to offer startlingly candid judgments before things go to trial. The peeling away of personalities and case details provides drama more gripping than any scripted procedural TV show. Though very unvarnished in its handling of the horrific details of the murders, it is essential viewing even if clocking in at a draining 150 minutes.
As for me, I couldn’t resist jumping right to two more hours worth of Part 2: Revelations, which follows-up on the story in 2000 and carries with it a whole extra set of issues, most notably the impact of the first film on the case and the lives of those involved. The filmmakers are given much less access this time around, and there is a lot of rehashing scenes from the first film, so the drive of the film is more halting and nowhere near as mesmerizing, but there is no shortage of bizarre behavior and twisting storyline. 
I don’t intend to ruin major points for the uninitiated, but needless to say, things still haven’t been completely resolved by the end of Part 2, hence this year’s release of Part 3: Purgatory. In the absence of ability to view it at this time I was compelled to play spoiler to myself. Honestly, I can’t attest to the quality of Purgatory itself, but I intend to watch it as soon as I can get my hands on it. The story of the murders, trial and aftermath encapsulates the anthropological/sociological aspect of the series, which is the part that really engrosses me. The way that Paradise Lost catches up with the major players, and captures the ways that they have changed, for better or worse, brings to mind Michael Apted’s monumental “Up Series,” possibly the most essential documentary series ever. If I had to suggest a documentary to help regrow any gray matter that has been destroyed by today’s Reality TV, it’s a no-brainer to start with 7 Up, (you’ll be hooked by 21, and I am stoked to hear 56 Up is premiering in a few months!) but next in line should be Paradise Lost.
Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills --92/100--
Paradise Lost 2: Revelations --84/100--
Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory: TBD
The Up Series: Eleventy Billion/100

Saturday, February 18, 2012

2012 Oscar Picks, part the second


{predicted winners in bold}
Best Music, Original Score
Nominees:
  • The Adventures of Tintin
  • The Artist
  • Hugo
  • Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  • War Horse
Worth mentioning: John Williams another double nominee for Tintin & War Horse, marking the 11th time he’s had two scores nominated for award in the same year, and 47 total nominations if you add in the few Original Song nods he’s garnered. If he picks it up this year I’ll be a little surprised. Despite the flap about recycling a portion of Bernard Herrmann’s Vertigo score during a crucial scene, I think The Artist still walks away with it. The rest of the score is vital and vibrant.


Best Music, Original Song
Nominees:
I can dig the Sergio Mendes thing, the music was one of the few saving graces of Rio, but I find it awesomely awesome that Bret McKenzie might win an Oscar for writing a faux power ballad for The Muppets. Coincidentally, the best song from Rio was really “Pretty Bird,” co-written and performed by his "Flight of the Conchords" cohort, Jemaine Clement. The Academy missed a golden opportunity for a killer contest...that only nerds like me would care about. 


Best Makeup
Nominees:
  • Albert Nobbs
  • Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows, Part 2
  • The Iron Lady
I mentioned a few weeks ago when the nominations were announced that I was a little surprised that HPDH2 missed out on the tenth Best Picture nomination. The entire series has made more money than God and been consistently quality, but despite a handful of nominations in categories ranging from Art Direction to Cinematography to Original Score, it has taken home exactly ZERO Oscar statuettes. I think that’ll change this year. I just don’t see enough wow in the other two nominees.

Best Art Direction
Nominees: 
  • The Artist
  • Harry Potter, DH2
  • Hugo
  • Midnight in Paris
  • War Horse

My initial thought was that HP would pick up hardware in all three of its categories based on a Lord of the Rings: Return of the King scenario, achievement of the series as a whole and all that, but looking over the nominees here I decided to hedge off that a bit. It’s a really tough call; I could understand any of these films winning. The storybook farmhouse and windmill sets from War Horse were the highlights of an otherwise melodramatic piece, The Artist and Midnight in Paris delivered stellar period settings, and HP continued the high caliber of design from the rest of the series. But ultimately I feel like all four were a little thin in spots compared to the immersive detail of Hugo.
Best Visual Effects
Nominees:
  • Harry Potter, DH2
  • Hugo
  • Real Steel
  • Rise of the Planet of the Apes
  • Transformers: Dark of the Moon

I’ve seen all of these, and again I’m sliding away from HP in favor of Hugo. The best use of 3D I’ve seen yet. I just don’t think the other three did anything as regularly jaw-dropping. I guess maybe I’m a little jaded in this CGI age, but there were moments in Transformers when the simple effects were unconvincing, the Kennedy stuff at the beginning, for example, and that detracted from the great work on the bots.

Best Achievement in Costume Design
Nominees:
  • Anonymous
  • The Artist
  • Hugo
  • Jane Eyre
  • W./E.

Period period period period period end of sentence mark

Best Sound Mixing
Nominees:
  • The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
  • Hugo
  • Moneyball
  • Transformers: Dark of the Moon
  • War Horse

Best Sound Editing
Nominees:
  • Drive
  • The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
  • Hugo
  • Transformers: Dark of the Moon
  • War Horse

Possibly a win for Drive or War Horse here, but I’m giving it to the grindy, clashy, blowy-uppy flick instead. I can foresee a time in the not-too-distant future where these two categories get shuffled off of the big broadcast & stuffed with the technical awards. They’re crucial, but I don’t think the Oscar audience will care that much.
Predictions on the big awards still to come!

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Oscar Picks 2012, Short Film Categories


With Oscar Night less than 2 weeks away I’m gonna try to get a jump start on making my picks, starting with the short film categories. Some of these shorts can be found on The Youtubes, but I’m not gonna hunt them down for ya this year (unless you ask nicely and I like you). If you live in a hip town like me there may very well be screenings for you to check out. Ann Arborites, check the schedule at the Michigan Theater here. $10 for each category - if I could only choose one each year (it would probably be because I'm poor) I’d suggest the animated shorts, they’re showing some extras so you’ll see four more “commended” films in addition to the five nominees. Warning: you will have to sit through the excruciatingly sappy trailer for Albert Nobbs each time you go.
Others, find yourself an art house. Support the local biznass, yo.
I’ll admit that, when it comes to the shorts, almost none of my favorites have won the award the last few years, so I may not be on the pulse of those who actually get to vote for these things. It’s all subjective, and frankly all of these shorts are noteworthy and will ultimately benefit by being seen by a wider audience.
My picks are in bold. If this goes as planned I’ll hit the big categories later next week and repost all of my picks before the awards:
Best Documentary, Short Subjects


Nominees:

  • The Barber of Birmingham
  • Incident in New Baghdad
  • Saving Face
  • The Tsunami and the Cherry Blossom
  • God is the Bigger Elvis
Since these are generally a little lengthier (around 30 minutes each on average), the screening at the Mich did not include “God is the Bigger Elvis,” (which curiously hasn't been released yet?) so I can only comment on the other four. These were solid but mostly depressing docs, the closest to a “feel good” film in the bunch was “The Barber of Birmingham,” which covers the life of Civil Rights “foot soldier.” Mr. James Armstrong, and his reaction to the 2008 election of Barack Obama. It didn’t blow me away, but it is mostly light and colorful, with moments of poignancy and stark reminiscence.

“Incident in New Baghdad” is the account of Ethan McCord, a US Army Specialist who was one of the first on the scene after the infamous incident that became a worldwide scandal after the video was released by wikileaks as "Collateral Murder." The photography and personal recounting of events make for a  gut-wrenching short, but it could have been fleshed out, maybe to feature-length, with additional interviews or a deeper dissection of the video and surrounding scandal.
“Saving Face” struck me about the same way. It details the deplorable trend of women in Pakistan who have been disfigured by acid attacks, most of which have been carried out by their own husbands. The images of the shocking effects of these assaults will stay in your brain for a long time. There is enough of a hopeful story arc to the film to lift it up, but it still felt overly taxing, although I would not be surprised to see this win.
My favorite, and pick to win, is “The Tsunami and the Cherry Blossom,” about the devastation along the coast of Japan from the March, 2011 natural disaster. Harrowing first-hand images and accounts of the destructive force of the wave find an amazing counterbalance in the detailing of the island’s significant preoccupation with sakura (cherry blossom). I found it a testament to the hopeful will of a nation in the face of unthinkable tragedy.


Best Short Film, Live Action


Nominees:

  • Pentecost
  • Raju
  • The Shore
  • Time Freak
  • Tuba Atlantic
This was certainly an eclectic group, starting with “Pentecost,” which had me laughing my head off by cribbing pre-game speech boilerplate and cleverly twisting it into a religious context. As an altar boy growing up (non-abused, thanks for asking), I felt a strong connection to it right off the bat and thought it would be hard to beat, but the other shorts proved to be just as strong.
“Time Freak,” the other purely comedic short, finds clever new problems in the ever-popular sci-fi quandary, “what do you do if you have a working time machine?” While a little too quick to develop any depth, it is nonetheless quirkily neurotic, memorable and very, very funny.
On the flip side of that is “Raju,” about a German couple who adopt an orphan fresh from the streets of India only to find that trying to better the life of a single child is a much more complex affair than they had bargained. It deftly uproots larger issues involving adoption, urban conditions, and bridging cultural gaps, but I found a bit of distaste with a slight xenophobic edge that unfairly casts villainy on certain people.
I think this is ultimately a close call between the final two films. “Tuba Atlantic” is a Norwegian short about an elderly man who learns he has a week to live and tries to reach out to his long-estranged brother. Yes, from that description you might think this is a weeper, I was pleasantly surprised that it has a dark streak of irascibility running through it, oozing with a unique stamp of Scandinavian humor that I’m only just beginning to appreciate. It’s frustrating but pleasantly distracting, like trying to navigate your way through an IKEA showroom and discovering a kickass little bookshelf around the corner.
Finally, “The Shore,” about a man returning to his homeland of Northern Ireland after 25 years, manages more depth than most feature-length films these days, and therefore gets my nonexistent vote. At times heart-achingly sentimental and at others witty and lighthearted, it works on many levels, as it is also a subtle allegory of the rift that has been splitting Ireland for centuries. A warm appeal for fence-mending and brotherhood. 
Best Short Film, Animated
Nominees:



  • Dimanche (Sunday)
  • The Fantastic Flying Books of Mr. Morris Lessmore
  • La Luna
  • A Morning Stroll
  • Wild Life
As you can tell by my picks in the first two categories, I have an appreciation for films that I feel find depth, balance and offer more than one note. That’s a little harder with the animated category, because they are typically shorter with a completely different M.O. than the documentary or live action shorts. When they first started awarding this category you’d see lots of Tom & Jerry, Tex Avery, Looney Tunes, etc., but as things have evolved the winners aren’t always humorous. Check out of my favorites of all time: Balance.
I implied earlier that if I could only pay for one screening each year I would go with the animated films, but ultimately, this year I think it is the weakest category as a whole. Sue me for being contradictory. Since these are much shorter on the whole I won’t touch on the individual stories at all. “The Fantastic Flying Books” was the biggest disappointment in the bunch; some excellent visual tricks, but essentially an extremely sappy after-school PSA encouraging kids to spend all of their time reading alone. Mostly eye-rolls from me.
“Dimanche” & “Wild Life” both have distinctly Canadian vibes to them. The latter is a cute, simply-drawn day-in-the-life with a few smart, twisted laughs. The former is interesting if a bit dry, a little too “Prairie Home Companion,” with an extra dose of the blankly existential.
“La Luna” is the Pixar-picked pic for this year. The story is a little sappy and the payoff a little disappointing, but they still never disappoint in squeezing every byte to deliver images that dazzle the eye. Not the best, but it was nice to see it glow on a big screen.
So that leaves my pick, “A Morning Stroll.” Again, this was a tough choice because I don’t think there’s a clear-cut winner, but this one delivered the biggest laughs and gained extra points, not just for using multiple styles of animation, but because those changing styles have a direct impact on the way that the story is delivered.
I’ll probably be back in a few days to lay out some more early picks.